ever so briefly and timidly into a more balanced view but did so in thoroughly half-assed fashion and has since been beaten back into submission. The right-wing media outlets that do offer the other side tend to be rife with a history of homophobia and other unsavoriness,
-
-
10. They don't want people to look at our site or Twitter feed and make their own decisions about us. Are we horrible, bigoted transphobes? Do we promote "conversion therapy"? Are we lying about the gender clinicians we have investigated, ALWAYS using their own words?
-
11. US journalism is a disgrace. It's dangerous & insidious because most Americans believe the Fourth Estate is devoted (as it once was) to the pursuit of (often uncomfortable) truths. So if citizens don't hear/read about something, why would they think they're missing anything?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The media is very heavily sponsored by the pharma industry and sponsors have tremendous power over what content is presented and what isn't. This is why people target sponsors when they want content removed. It works that way without the public's input as well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.