There are different degrees of flaws to studies. There's flaws regarding sample size, methodology, etc. Most of these don't invalidate the study. Littman's study is foundationally flawed in a way that completely undermines every part of it. It's a pack of lies.
-
-
-
It's not as if the *many* accurate criticisms of Littman's paper (calling it a "study" is like calling you a feminist - both would be a lie) are difficult to find. Zinnia is only one of many who identified that none of the supposed "ROGD sufferers" were even contacted.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The very basis of Littmans study was flawed. And it's your ONLY study. Addressing your study's flaw necessitates tossing the study, it's that bad. And tossing the study leaves you with nothing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.