Yes. I'm an expert on it the topic. Ever hear of "post hoc ergo propter hoc"?
-
-
Replying to @JamesCantorPhD @CraigHarper19 and
In your expert opinion, should we, along with P, include R (rapists)? What are the principles that gave gay people rights to have sexual relationships with consenting adults, that would be applicable to men whose sexual focus is on child molestation?pic.twitter.com/StMz7cfLCO
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @lascapigliata8 @CraigHarper19 and
No. I can only repeat the refrain you will not here. P is about attraction pattern. R is about a behaviour. People cannot help their attraction patterns. And people remain entirely responsible for what the do. Nothing is helped by condemning what they did not choose.
2 replies 3 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @JamesCantorPhD @lascapigliata8 and
So following your logic, you see some value in LGB ++++ being a catchall for anyone (besides vanilla heterosexuals) who "can't help their attraction patterns"? Not trying to be snarky, but it's hard to understand your position on that.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @lascapigliata8 and
(Not snarky at all.) Yes, you described my opinion exactly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JamesCantorPhD @lascapigliata8 and
Why? Why does that help anyone? It certainly doesn't help LG ppl be more accepted or understood.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @lascapigliata8 and
Yes, it does. It pushes everyone to reach for the Golden Rule: What would I want happen if *I* were born like that? When we can learn to apply that even to pedophiles, all other prejudices will evaporate.
2 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @JamesCantorPhD @4th_WaveNow and
I"m afraid
@JamesCantorPhD, that you are out of touch with the general public. "LGBT" is thrown around like the members like being lumped (many don't because T is now quickly transing little LGB kids). But add "P" and the court of public opinion will pushback on ALL LGBTQP.1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @notworthmessing @4th_WaveNow and
Got it. "Throw others under the bus if they might interfere with me getting what I want for myself." To the extent that is the general public opinion is the extent which I am happy to be among the exceptions.
6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JamesCantorPhD @notworthmessing and
Why is not wanting to include every sexual proclivity in one's movement equivalent to throwing anyone under the bus? It would be like telling someone who fights drunk driving that they're throwing people who fight gambling under the bus if they don't fuse their movements.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
*addictive gambling
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.