Yes it is, and it does. Bye Hannibal.
-
-
-
Replying to @CraigHarper19 @wierstamann and
Yes, I am aware of the possibility that some paedophiles might not have molested children, yet, and that very rarely they might seek treatment. But I don’t know a single example of one not using child pornography, which is harm by proxy. Most are dangerous rapists and liars.
1 reply 2 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @lascapigliata8 @CraigHarper19 and
Factually & scientifically untrue
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @AutonomyCounsel @CraigHarper19 and
This is utter BS and you know it. Stop trying to recast an extremely violent and dangerous group of men as victims. Paedophilia is not a victimless activity.
1 reply 3 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @lascapigliata8 @AutonomyCounsel and
You're right - paedophilia is not an activity at all.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @CraigHarper19 @AutonomyCounsel and
Really? Fantasising about molesting children and masturbating to films of child abuse, are not activities? Tell us more about why you think childlike dolls for paedos to practice their rape fantasies on are a good idea. Ever heard of escalation?https://medium.com/@CraigHarper19/lets-talk-about-sex-dolls-50f9be2e6198 …
3 replies 4 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @lascapigliata8 @CraigHarper19 and
Yes. I'm an expert on it the topic. Ever hear of "post hoc ergo propter hoc"?
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @JamesCantorPhD @CraigHarper19 and
In your expert opinion, should we, along with P, include R (rapists)? What are the principles that gave gay people rights to have sexual relationships with consenting adults, that would be applicable to men whose sexual focus is on child molestation?pic.twitter.com/StMz7cfLCO
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @lascapigliata8 @CraigHarper19 and
No. I can only repeat the refrain you will not here. P is about attraction pattern. R is about a behaviour. People cannot help their attraction patterns. And people remain entirely responsible for what the do. Nothing is helped by condemning what they did not choose.
2 replies 3 retweets 9 likes
So following your logic, you see some value in LGB ++++ being a catchall for anyone (besides vanilla heterosexuals) who "can't help their attraction patterns"? Not trying to be snarky, but it's hard to understand your position on that.
-
-
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @lascapigliata8 and
(Not snarky at all.) Yes, you described my opinion exactly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JamesCantorPhD @lascapigliata8 and
Why? Why does that help anyone? It certainly doesn't help LG ppl be more accepted or understood.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.