Whatever the person needs.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
There is no 90% group, unless you have the research for that as well.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Checked out the referred links. Only one has statistically significant numbers and is recent enough to be relevant. That study (Steensma et al, 2013) only talks of those *referred* to GICs, not who are recommended for treatment. Even the biased article says 60-90% not 90%.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Correction to Peter’s statement: most people who had *gender identity disorder* grew out of it. Don’t conflate publications that used GID diagnostic criteria with GD which has different diagnostic criteria. Again, give it 18 months to see what the data is on the new criteria.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @briejnm @orpheusgrrl and
And the $5.7 mill NIH grant doesn't include studies re: persistence-desistance, does it? They only look at socially-medically transitioned youth over a short (5-year) period. Regretters, false positives, and desisters aren't even part of their research.
2 replies 2 retweets 5 likes
Typical response to this is "it would be unethical to withhold blockers or hormones." That last statement is repeated as gospel. Yet what of the desisters we know of, whose parents DID withhold"med transition & the young people are glad for it? will anyone study them?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.