It's hard to "rationally engage" unsubstantiated sarcasm...
-
-
-
Notwithstanding her use of air quotes, Dr. Olson clearly doesn't believe that biology supports sexual dimorphism in Homo sapiens.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Queer science?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Oh god, talk about the Augean stables.
That level of bullshit by someone with a vested interest in keeping it going, who even wants to start?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did you read her Twitter profile? OMFG! And did you see recent the Rachel McKinnon stuff on Twitter? So I looked him up. He got his PhD at the same university in the town where I grew up that my father taught at.
PS my father was a scam artist, so somehow appropriate…Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s difficult to find myself agreeing with Trump & Co, but, it does seem reasonable to start with a scientific definition of human sex. The civil rights issue should be protecting the right to present any way you wish, and I believe the constitution already covers that.
-
According to some pundits, that definition of sex is "new."https://twitter.com/jonathanweisman/status/1053987868807446528 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What is a “psych prof”? Psychedelic professional?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.