The irony of this is that it positions the Trump admin as being firmly on the pro-science, reality-based camp. I'd like to see Dems oppose this without coming across as completely batshit. Surprised it took Trump this long to use this as a winning wedge issue. It's a no-brainer.https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1054020763848712192 …
-
-
Thing is, as SCOTUS is currently constituted, this will be upheld if lib orgs (i.e. the formerly nonpartisan ACLU) decide to challenge it legally. What's maddening as a lib is that I very much support the Trump admin on this. Talk about cognitive dissonance.
-
LGBT orgs staked out an extreme position on trans issues several years ago. The backlash was predictable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Is there a compromise, really? Government needs to choose between protecting women and children vs some very nasty ideologies. I honestly don't understand how Obama couldn't see that. I don't want to sacrifice one woman or girl or young boy for deviants/fetishists.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.