See I think this kind of mad social constructionism can unfortunately at least in part be laid at the door of feminism. In seeking to deny - for pro-women reasons - any kind of relationship between biology and normative behaviours some feminists opened the door to transactivism.https://twitter.com/UglaStefania/status/1040916378126114817 …
-
Show this thread
-
If we’re going to engage with the idea that male aggression & violence may have some basis in biology then we have to engage with all of evo psych and the other branches of science that situate some normative sexed behaviour differences in biology.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
I get why many feminists are keen to downplay the idea that some normative differences between the sexes may have a basis in bodies/evolution: there’s a queue of dickheads lining up to argue that that means we should get back in the kitchen.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
But when it comes to challenging trans lunacy that reluctance to consider a possible bio basis to some sex differences is a fatal weakness. I’m certain that’s why we see so many nasty misogynists lining up to chant ‘Trans women are women’.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Pushing back against bio determinism has helped (at least partially) free women from in many cases grimly restrictive lives. So the backlash goes: ‘ok, if you say diffs between the sexes are arbitrary & socially constructed then it follows that a woman can have a penis amirite?!’
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
This puts the gender critical feminist argument in an invidious bind: either a) you concede the potential for some bio influences on interest/personality diffs between the sexes and get wazzocks like this all up in your grill wanting to justify abusive marriages w/ evo psych; orpic.twitter.com/x7AxJ2wUXe
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Or b) you tie yourself in knots trying to find some way to explain why men can’t be women other than the indivisibility of female biology from the experience of being female. It can just about be done but it’s holed below the waterline.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Whereas if you can push back against transgenderism using the mountains of evidence from many fields of science that show male humans are way more violent than females & that this is rooted in human evolution & biology all the ‘ladyfeelz’ stuff is so transparently a load of BS.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
BUT that would necessitate the same feminist voices grappling less defensively with the implications of evo psych for the struggle to liberate women from the oppressive aspects of human culture’s oversimplification of our bio nature as sexually dimorphic human animals.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
A lot of people don't seem to understand statistics. Just because certain traits **on average** are more common in one sex than the other does not mean **individuals** should be judged according to the mean, or have fewer opportunities to deviate from the mean.
-
-
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @moveincircles
Yr point re: "fatal weakening" is key. Feminists are too often perceived as stopping their ears/refusing to listen to inconvenient data, & are thus dismissed. The "slippery slope" is what causes this ear-stopping, but as you point out, MISUSE of data doesn't invalidate that data
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.