See I think this kind of mad social constructionism can unfortunately at least in part be laid at the door of feminism. In seeking to deny - for pro-women reasons - any kind of relationship between biology and normative behaviours some feminists opened the door to transactivism.https://twitter.com/UglaStefania/status/1040916378126114817 …
-
Show this thread
-
If we’re going to engage with the idea that male aggression & violence may have some basis in biology then we have to engage with all of evo psych and the other branches of science that situate some normative sexed behaviour differences in biology.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
I get why many feminists are keen to downplay the idea that some normative differences between the sexes may have a basis in bodies/evolution: there’s a queue of dickheads lining up to argue that that means we should get back in the kitchen.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
But when it comes to challenging trans lunacy that reluctance to consider a possible bio basis to some sex differences is a fatal weakness. I’m certain that’s why we see so many nasty misogynists lining up to chant ‘Trans women are women’.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread
This is why our profile states we are rational feminists.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.