These sites are literally openly allied with anti-LGBT hate groups, and promoters of reparative therapy. They all oppose legal protections and access to medical care for trans ppl. See the list of groups at hand across the aisle.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You only have to look at the stated positions of the organizations involved.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
1. Rejecting your child's identity 2. Support for therapy aimed at changing 3. Formal alliances with anti-LGBT hate groups 4. Opposition to all transition related medical care 5. Labeling all trans women as either deluded gay men or fetishists
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BrynnTannehill @Yes_That_Dolly and
None of these points apply to Transgender Trend.
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @Transgendertrd @Yes_That_Dolly and
So, you deny your affiliation with hands Across the Aisle? And that the right wing orgs in it? Because all of your names are right there on the web page as sponsors.
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @BrynnTannehill @Transgendertrd and
"Sponsors"? We are not "affiliated" with Hands Across the Aisle or other groups you claim as "woman hating." The fact that they list our site on theirs means they see us as allies in raising awareness about pediatric transition. That's an official denial, not that we owe you one.
4 replies 1 retweet 28 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @BrynnTannehill and
Oh, & before you bring screen grabs of one of the 1000s of comments on our site over the last 3.5 years, be sure to call the NYT a Nazi organization when you find the alt-right KKK member who commented there one time. Have close a look at our "About" section & feel free to share.pic.twitter.com/3sOz13dEJ7
1 reply 2 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @BrynnTannehill and
Bonus! Here's our longstanding comment policy and sidebar material. Please feel free to share liberally.pic.twitter.com/UWRm1kcjlt
1 reply 1 retweet 12 likes
From Littman's study: NONE of the kids would have met DSM-V criteria. How interesting that Tannehill and other study critics ignore this, especially: "Five of the indicators (A2-6) are readily observable behaviors and preferences that would be difficult for a parent to miss."pic.twitter.com/exSHlrCTq9
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.