Open discussion and criticism that engages with the substance of the study is not "muzzling" anything. It's just amplifying something you don't want to hear. https://twitter.com/4th_WaveNow/status/1033405674523258880 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ZJemptv
Let's talk about some of the things YOU don't seem to want to hear--like this person's story. She fits the profile of social-media fueled
#ROGD . In her own words. This is the "substance" of Littman's study. And there are many more like her. https://4thwavenow.com/2018/01/18/i-hated-her-guts-at-the-time-a-trans-desister-and-her-mom-tell-their-story/ …pic.twitter.com/1Q10tnofUG
3 replies 6 retweets 10 likes
Or perhaps this one? Is her experience--in her own words, describing her temporary trans identification as being partially fueled by social contagion--"substance" you're interested in engaging vs. your usual dismissal that #ROGD is a "hoax diagnosis?"
https://4thwavenow.com/2018/03/12/baptised-in-fire-a-relieved-desisters-story/ …pic.twitter.com/QUO3HJtkxL
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.