Not scary
Not scary
Not scary 
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But much more scary are the common photographs of dead family members
-
I've seen those...
-
Me too. Creepy and sad but also kinda fascinating... I mean, they wanted to have something left, a memory
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Which begs the question- why not just allow the mother to be in the photo?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Have you done a post about the victorian death portraits?pic.twitter.com/ftWvrLxQiG
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not creepy at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Very freaky

Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
1800s special effects. Who needs photoshop when you can have a cloak??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Way too spooky!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you know if this method was also used in postmortem photography? I've seen mother holding child, but not mother covered.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Old photos have inherent creepiness to them. Hidden people just ramp up the eerie
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The hidden mother - yes, unintentionally creepy!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Niquabs surely.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Spooky! Sums up the value society put on women!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.