Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @3clifton

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @3clifton

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Don't be distracted. He did it once. And he will continue to cheat in the elections. He abused his power once. And he’s planning on doing it again. For Trump and Republicans in Washington, it’s .

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Today, I have the solemn responsibility to uphold my oath of Growing up in Alabama I learned right from wrong. What the President did was more than wrong. Someone has to stand up & say so. I will fulfill my oath & vote in favor of both articles of impeachment.

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    It couldn’t be more simple: the president was afraid he was going to lose the next election, so he decided to cheat. This is a clear abuse of power, a misuse of the office of the presidency. Trump thinks he’s above the law—and it’s the Senate’s job to tell him he's not.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I’m proud to be living in the same country as Senator Doug Jones. Unfortunately the majority of US Senators do not live in the America our Founders envisioned.

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Major respect for . At this time of division in our country, we need courage and moral clarity now more than ever.

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    BREAKING: Senator Doug Jones just announced he will vote to convict Trump today on both articles of impeachment

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    I'll support and work for any Democrat who wins the nomination, but I'm pulling for Elizabeth Warren. I'd love to see her open a large can of whup-ass on Trump in the debates.

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    Many people are saying Donald Trump is a Russian money launderer.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Senators should have insisted on a fair trial with documents and witnesses. They chose not to. Some argue, let the election decide — But that argument is unpersuasive when the President is trying to cheat in 2020.

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    The amazing thing for all the rhetoric of President Trump's lawyers: They gave no rebuttal of specifics, of the articles, of the need for witnesses and documents. It was an overwhelmingly powerful case made by the House Managers and by Adam Schiff. His speech today moved me.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    Trump’s guilty. Raise your hand if you agree. If you don’t agree, then it’s time for you to wake up and pull your head out of the sand. He did it. All of it. Everything.

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    BREAKING: Protests scheduled for Wednesday night in hundreds of cities across the country to protest this sham of an impeachment “trial.”

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Trump committed Bribery—the facts confirm it, and many of us told Democrats to write the articles of impeachment that way. They didn't—which, ironically, means they still can. Democrats should continue their investigation for another two months and then impeach Trump for Bribery.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    Sekulow giving the weirdest argument against witnesses ever. He's saying he didn't get to cross examine Sondland&other witnesses in House, and if they are called in the Senate, he'd cross-x them That's the whole point! If you had an innocent client, that's what you'd want to do.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    A shockingly sad day for the American rule of law. We know there are key eyewitnesses who have not testified in this impeachment trial. Yet Republicans refuse to allow the American people to hear from them. I’m depressed about the status and future or our republic.

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Lev Parnas is RIGHT NOW spilling the tea that Lindsey Graham was totally involved in the Ukraine fiasco. Because of course he was.

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    . just asked a great question: Why call the thing we’ve been watching an impeachment “trial” when it wasn’t a trial at all? A bunch of statements by politicians on one side and conflicted lawyers on the other, with no evidence at all, is a “trial” in name only.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    We forced a fourth vote on ’s amendment to require Chief Justice Roberts to rule on motions to subpoena witnesses and documents, and to rule on any assertion of privilege. But Senate Republicans voted for a cover-up and a sham trial.

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    I forced a third vote to subpoena John Bolton, providing one day for a deposition presided over by the Chief Justice, and one day for live Senate testimony—both of which must have occured within 5 days. But Senate Republicans voted for a cover-up and a sham trial.

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Today’s 51-49 vote for no witnesses, no evidence, hence no real trial makes next Wednesday’s baked-in vote to acquit wholly anticlimactic: fake trial = fake acquittal = no exoneration at all.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·