But wait, there's more! A footnote with another quick explanation of the formula, and some added discussion of independence.https://youtu.be/U_85TaXbeIo
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
If you are interested in some fascinating recent experiments in human intuition / gambling / probability check out Ole Peters's new paper (especially figure 3) - my guess is you'll find his work to be fascinating:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-019-0732-0 …
-
Thanks!
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
That's a great video, thank you for putting that together. but, about Linda... Not exactly. See our replication attempt of a test of that in two camps, we explain what the evidence is and limit of scope https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334544541_Frequency_estimation_and_semantic_ambiguity_do_not_eliminate_conjunction_bias_when_it_occurs_Replication_and_extension_of_Mellers_Hertwig_and_Kahneman_2001 … Like you said, it's... Weird. More evidence needed.
-
I'll take a look, thanks!
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
- Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The whole channel is really amazing for building mathematical intuition

- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Why don't we just this "continuum" for other/all areas of mathematics and learning?
#iTeachMathpic.twitter.com/DIry5lk8dd
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
