Guys...we gotta narrow our streets
-
-
Haunted Forrest 🌲 Retweeted Haunted Forrest 🌲
My proposal is to assign existing streets (centerlines to be precise, since we're ignoring existing widths) to categories in this 5-tier schema:https://twitter.com/380kmh/status/966026690723041281 …
Haunted Forrest 🌲 added,
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
Major streets will probably stay the same width, but most streets would end up assigned to a category narrower than they're actually built. This residual land would be passed onto whatever properties fronted the street.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
For example--a 22' wide street reclassified as a 10' wide "class D" would bring property lines on either side of the street 6' closer to the centerline
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @380kmh
An extra 6' of land on each side would be difficult to actually make use of without demolishing or heavily modifying every existing structure, which seems unlikely to be worth it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @threestationsq @380kmh
Seems better to give all 12' (or more) to one side of the street, so only half as many structures need to be rebuilt to make use of it, and there's more motivation for them to do so.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @threestationsq
for a case where there are 12' to spare, maybe (although how do you decide which side of the street lucks out?), but there are bound to be cases where there's even less to parcel out. I'm anticipating more of a long-term benefit here--existing structures won't be there forever
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
If there's 6' to spare on each side then that can be 12' on one side (and many US streets have far more to spare). Nobody "lucks out"; auction off the new lots with first refusal rights for the existing abutters.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.