Saying RTAs gotta reinvent themselves like the T: so...remain dependent on huge infusions of money from taxpayers, right? Because in the next breath it sounds like you think they *shouldn't* do that
-
-
Show this thread
-
There's no operating a network that is obliged to prioritize coverage over ridership "more smartly," but if you really want to give RTAs permission to go after ridership, make it official policy at the state level so we don't get sued to pieces by our existing riders
Show this thread -
Also hard to believe I'm reading that MBTA is looking at reducing fares for people closer to commuter rail stations--you know, those who already have the fewest obstacles to accessing them. Never mind that the commuter rail is ALREADY losing money and is in no place to cut fares!
Show this thread -
Outright lying here, there is nothing complicated about a mixed urban/regional rail system--this is the default in Japan, it's right there to be studied whenever anyone at the DOT develops an ounce of curiosity in improving thingspic.twitter.com/zygpIdiFHS
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also, "it's okay if your train is slow because you can get work done."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.