or, you know, PAY MOREhttps://twitter.com/nytimes/status/980631962523262977 …
The article says right off the bat that unemployment rates are higher than they have been (which is SUPPOSED to be the cue to pay more)
-
-
Employers should absolutely pay more! But when unemployment rates are this low, they *also* need to look at ways to expand the labor force (or make their existing workforce more productive)
-
What part of "unemployment rates are not low" are you missing here
-
"chorus of complaints about worker shortages… have trouble retaining workers even when the jobless rate is well above its historically low level of 4.1 percent… Reducing that churn has become harder as the unemployment rate has dropped"
-
The whole dang article is about how labor markets are tight!
-
"Of course they might, if the pay were good enough." The whole dang article is about how they are trying to weasel out of higher wages
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.