Whatever you meant would be just as effective. The medium is the message m8
-
-
Replying to @Logo_Daedalus
Again you’re acting like enforcement efforts would have to be infallible to have a positive effect, not the case.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IgnatiusUnderh2
They have to have force behind them. You should go full out & endorse arresting pornographers etc. Otherwise you're just half-stepping.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Logo_Daedalus @IgnatiusUnderh2
wait what made you think arresting pornographers isn't part of the picture here
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @380kmh @IgnatiusUnderh2
He said "accessible" - nothing about production.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Logo_Daedalus @IgnatiusUnderh2
ok but as you're saying yourself: how exactly would one go about restricting access to porn without busting the people who make it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh @IgnatiusUnderh2
Exactly- & it turns out that a webcam & an iphone makes every person a potential pornographer.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
potential pornographers are not the problem here
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
"I'm not making porn this is an art blog with donations."
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
in all earnestness, the society that would be ok with draconian antiporn measures would not be fooled by today's rhetorical tap-dancing
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
yes, and the fact that we wouldn't be ok with draconian measures of any kind (not even against people who litter smdh) is why this won't fly--not the existence of the internet
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.