A network which relies on people to have no other options before they're likely to use it is not a very good network! What are their frequencies, what are their travel times.... https://twitter.com/urbanophile/status/959464896160256000 …
-
-
At least as recently as 2015, LA had plans for dedicated ROWs and 5-minute headways in the busiest parts of the city...did the plans get scrapped? Approved but not yet implemented? http://media.metro.net/board/Items/2015/03_march/20150326othersectorbrcitem2.pdf …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Am I going to have to write a blog post about why 15-minute headways are not really "frequency is freedom"?
-
If you like! I would certainly like to see your thoughts on the matter...I don't want people to abandon the push for 15-minute headways, it just must not stop there
-
I kind of do want people to abandon that push. 15-minute headways without takts or timed transfers suck.
-
they are pretty important in smaller towns though, where resources for better frequency are hard to come by--but yes the push must emphasize timed transfers as well
-
I would rather a push to *avoid* low frequencies tbh...avoid wasting money on routes that are useless by design
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.