people who want to go across a continent have plenty of planes to take; people who want to get around their own cities without driving, on the other hand, could really use more trains https://twitter.com/TiredGuyReturns/status/955187164098256897 …
-
-
Shorter distances work out better for high speed rail, because over these distances, air passengers will likely spend more time at airports than flying: - Boston to DC (3hr) - NYC to Toronto (3hr 20m) - SF to LA (2hr 30m) - Dallas to Houston (1hr 30m) etc etc
Show this thread -
But as I said at the outset...urban and suburban rail is the real prizepic.twitter.com/59OAdDpMUG
Show this thread -
The Tokaido Shinkansen--the world's busiest high speed railway--carries around 400,000 people a day The Odakyu Railway--6th busiest in Tokyo--carries around 2 million a daypic.twitter.com/ys7iTcTo6d
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Huge fan of the Baltimore to Atlanta Amtrak route
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
train inside that range but longer than easy drive range is good: if you look at Boston-NYC-DC range, think MSP-MIlwaukee-Chicago style
-
also, high volume routes/legs. LA-Vegas. Do you remember the situation w/LAX-LAS HSR from Obama stimulus bill?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.