#7: Shanghai (+ some neighbors: Suzhou, Wuxi, Nanjing...)pic.twitter.com/L9SUsG6thy
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
London has lots of fare-integrated "commuter rail" at frequencies of 4-5 / hours. If you had a 10 min or better map; NYC would be better than London; 20 min threshold London better [NYC commuter rail is mostly 2 /hour or worse]
the NYC pattern of going from rapid transit with high freq and close spacing to low frequency commuter with nothing in between is weird
it's Boston's problem too, very bad
yea, it's a problem for any of the larger North American transit cities; feels stranger in NYC given densities and how extensive the rapid transit network is
But a European country like the UK would have taken the mainline network and turned into a medium freq transit network
as Japan did (except hi freq) and as the US should!
I know that's probably old news to an enthusiast like you, but I just heard about it the other day and thout it was very interesting. Other countries could adopt the methodology to better optimize their transit development at virtually no cost. Exciting stuff!
Mumbai is really sparse for its size & density
I'm the US, the Northeastern cities (Boston, NYC, Philly) generally have extensive rail/subway networks b/c built when labor was cheap. Midwest/West Coast generally bad (except San Fran)
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.