That's a good concept, but is "sprawl" the most useful thing to call it? Something could fit that description but be pretty compact
-
-
That's a really nice example of an American suburb too, but I'd still call that sprawl and not the Japanese one.
-
I'm not arguing that Japan is the metric by which one defines good, if they have sprawl they have sprawl, but I don't think Tokyo has a lot-
-
-compared to the fact the entire US is basically defined by it. Many US "cities" are really just sprawl and nothing else, you've seen that.
-
Yeah, I hear this--but there's a clear concept of *extent* in sprawl which is misleading, and density is less the issue than walkability
-
True, but I think density tends to imply walkablility, and below a certain density walkability is impractical.
-
Granting this: isn't it easier to just say walkability then? avoid the confusion
-
Especially since there is a sort of density which is horrible for walking
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.