(if you can call it that) on their part. One is seduced by rhetoriticians, promising power, community, etc- for a reason.
-
-
the ideal would be moderated, polite discussions, so that everyone can understand that the opposing side aren't all monsters/inherently evil
-
but there are some inherent disagreements; how a state forms, functions, whether it should exist, treatment of labour, etc-- these can
-
be debated and minds changed, but in the end, there'll always be bitter disagreements.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.