Yeah but unless those office workers are being paid minimum wage dunno if its efficient.If there's *that* much downtime they should downsize
-
-
Replying to @BitingGadfly @380kmh
Unless the office is, *right* next to a station, but then that only works for the one station
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BitingGadfly
The whole point is to reassign people so that (with magic of telecom) there's a couple of people for *every* station
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
So you'd have little offices right next to each station? Or you'd hire people who lived next to particular stations?Either seems impractical
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BitingGadfly
They currently commute to work, no? So they commute to somewhere else. Working IN the stations, not next to them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
So you'd build office facilities into every station?Seems expensive, but i guess they already have wifi. Might be a noisy work environment.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BitingGadfly
I admit I'm thinking of Boston here not NYC but yes, all they really need is a laptop etc
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
Well presumably they'd also need a ~large quiet space to sit which was partitioned from the general subway population.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BitingGadfly
Large: no, not really Quiet: yes, pretty important Partitioned: obligatory, goes without saying
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
Well when I said ~large I meant big enough to fit a desk and chair, probably for more then one person, not too cramped.Not a janitors closet
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Generally speaking American ideas of space requirements are total nonsense
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.