ya ya and if John 3:16 is so important why is it only in John *all four* gospels are essential
Nonsense, it can cite its legitimacy in the Gospels, but doesn't exalt that passage above the rest.
-
-
The passage in question is how Simon came to be called Peter, yes? Do they not call him Peter in the others? Or the letters?
-
How many times would the story of why Simon became Peter need to be related before you'd accept it as canon?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.