-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I recognized some of the questions as ones used by Haidt in his morality studies.
-
ok so then Haidt is a perv (and prob sex offender)
-
He's no Kinsey, I don't think, but I can't read his mind; just his books. He seemed rather sympathetic to more traditional morality.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
it's a stupid test, requiring some ridiculous assumptions
-
Agreed; it keeps posing scenarios like "X and Y happen, okay or not okay?" rather than the politically relevant "then Z flashes a badge and
-
...shoots" versions
-
(the assumption that "I object to X" => "I do not object to use of force against X" is intrinsically pro-authoritarian)
-
"it's not nice to do X" vs. "there should be a law against X" vs "you can do X and X is totally moral" are not three complete distinct class
-
agreed; especially, the supererogatory vs. morally neutral distinction matters
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
ah yes, the three kinds of people: "left-liberal", "right-liberal", and "far-right liberal"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is not far from mine. More caring than a liberal, more purity-minded than a conservative; liberty is Satan's carnival.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That test really tortures the term "Fairness"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.