can't support itself? do you mean, in terms of ridership revenue?
-
-
-
-
Replying to @Dr_Zan_
with over a billion annual trips, no, that's not why
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @380kmh
Ah...so ridership fees are going to padding political pockets rather than to needed infrastructure investments? Sounds like 3rd world shit
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Dr_Zan_
sort of...more complicated--ridership cannot cover current operating expenses, which is why taxpayers do, BUT operating expenses too high...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @380kmh
...and taxpayer support too easy to game, which means expenses can just spiral higher and higher
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @380kmh
I'm no expert but seems to me the system should be closed loop of ridership revenue supporting continued service.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.