thats silly, the sabotage had clear and telegraphed intentions it wasnt aimless
-
-
Replying to @memogetter
I'm not saying it's aimless, I'm saying it had broader impacts than their stated one. It's like burning down congress to kill a congressman.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
in the grand scheme of things, it probably had very little impact anyway, its mostly a symbolic action
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @memogetter
So: much more damage than intended if it worked, vain and annoying if it didn't. Fuck those guys.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
its damage and/or annoyance to carbon capital, which the saboteurs wouldnt think of as 'their neighbors' or on their team
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @memogetter
For the nth time: fracking equipment is not the only thing that goes via BNSF and the Port of Olympia
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
If they wanna do some industrial sabotage that hits carbon capital where it hurts, there are coal mines in Wyoming I'd be happy to see gone
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
Shall I write up a list of more worthwhile targets than a mixed use freight line?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @memogetter @380kmh
youve gone from 'its wrong' to 'its stupid' by the way
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
how far upthread did I say "it's dumb to fuck with supply chains" but more to the point, wrong and stupid have an awful lot of overlap
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.