Until trains can offer the same kind of point-to-point on-demand experience that my car can, you're not going to see much change.
-
-
Replying to @skirtsnhose
They do so when walking is doing the heavy lifting: when you can walk to most places you want, everything else falls into place.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
and that works when "point-to-point" only covers a tiny fraction of your urban area and a tiny fraction of the urban area you're visiting.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @skirtsnhose
It works when you don't feel compelled to have millions of people in one place before building in an urban style (pic related)pic.twitter.com/AENlmsKdmp
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
Again, no it doesn't, because it doesn't allow you meaningful *off-network* access.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @skirtsnhose
It obviates the problem bc everywhere is on the network. What your saying is like saying cars won't work bc u can't go off the road network
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
First, I can take my car off the road network. Second, there is no possibility of a train network connecting all the places served by roads.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @skirtsnhose
Lol, you can take your car off the road network provided there's level enough ground and wide clearance between trees etc...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
My feet can handle terrain that no car can touch
-
-
Replying to @380kmh
Mine too, but to get there takes a car, unless you want to commit a week for a simple hike.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.