If the lines that you're connecting between are both that frequent, no, you still don't need to look at the schedule, I know from experience https://twitter.com/skirtsnhose/status/879460950478209024 …
Bus distances are usually either walkable or bikeable--at least, if buses are a support network for trains. If they're the core, not so much
-
-
Dude not every urban area is built for trains. I know this is your point on some level but they also *will not be.* Nor should they be.
-
Yes they should be; if your core transit is buses then there are at least one or two lines in it that are at capacity and should upgrade
-
The core transit is cars, nationwide, because Americans like being able to go where they want, when they want.
-
Until trains can offer the same kind of point-to-point on-demand experience that my car can, you're not going to see much change.
-
They do so when walking is doing the heavy lifting: when you can walk to most places you want, everything else falls into place.
-
As for most of the country, I'm not interested in changing it--I just want New England to get better.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.