If the lines that you're connecting between are both that frequent, no, you still don't need to look at the schedule, I know from experience https://twitter.com/skirtsnhose/status/879460950478209024 …
? I mean that at those frequencies, there is little advantage to be gained by looking at a schedule. The *most* time you can save is 5 mins
-
-
You don't live where it's 120°. Timing matters.
-
Plus I have zero faith that stops that are supposed to happen, will actually happen. I speak from experience here.
-
are you thinking trains will just breeze through stations for laughs? wtf
-
Buses do, and that's largely the best way to connect to trains in an integrated system. And again, I want to access stuff off the network.
-
Bus distances are usually either walkable or bikeable--at least, if buses are a support network for trains. If they're the core, not so much
-
Dude not every urban area is built for trains. I know this is your point on some level but they also *will not be.* Nor should they be.
-
Yes they should be; if your core transit is buses then there are at least one or two lines in it that are at capacity and should upgrade
-
The core transit is cars, nationwide, because Americans like being able to go where they want, when they want.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.