It would exclude poor, elderly, or illegal riders who are commuting to a 9-5 office job in downtown SF from a few specific neighborhoods...
I don't expect Lyft is interested in, or even capable of, replacing MUNI or other transit providers. It's not going for the same market.
-
-
But if they did, and if their transit was more pleasant to ride and less expensive to operate--how, exactly, would that be a bad thing?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Safety laws are important. Also, public buses are generally comfortable, which makes the experience tolerable; wouldn't want more tiny seats
-
Safety is important--if laws improve safety, good, if not, no point to them. Buses are hit-or-miss for comfort in my experience...
-
...but who said anything about more tiny seats? Seems out of left field here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Main problem is that they'll scoop up all the good routes and leave public transit bleed cash and degrade their service
-
Somebody has to serve those backwater late night routes and it won't be Lyft. Basically a story of public transit in any post-USSR country
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.