I'm with you on the airport thing but as for the former point, why double down on the cause of depopulation and expect the opposite result?
...or stop needing that particular resource entirely because of some technological breakthrough. When that happens...
-
-
...you still need to import everything you used to, but you no longer have any way of paying for it. In a first world country this means...
-
...you relyi heavily on welfare & other transfer payments; in a poorer country it means starve, flee, or figure out how to make more locally
-
The problem with transfer payments is it means your local productive capacity continues to go undeveloped, so you need more every year
-
How do you get out of this bind? How do you kickstart an atrophying economy? Unfortunately lots of people promise an answer here...
-
...but the stagnant regions of the first world continue to be let down by the results.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.