London got to where it is with strong *local* business growth, not by getting transplant after transplant from more successful cities.
They don't "see" it that way, it *is* that way--if a northern city became a place to succeed, it would start picking up quick growth too
-
-
But again, this means figuring out what made London grow in the first place, why the industrial revolution saw London explode with growth...
-
...instead of those cities closer to resources, or home to large mill complexes. What made London different? That's the key here.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Yeah, works for me. I'm not offering other solutions because I don't know of any that reliably work. But there's one option that might...
-
...which would be to divide the country itself, so that successor states could mint their own currency, set their own trade policies, etc...
-
...this worked to bring Norway back from the grinding poverty and interminable stagnation it endured while united with Sweden.
-
This also worked for Slovakia; Bratislava was never able to compete with Prague while they were part of the same country and using same $$$
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.