... Anything beyond one megabyte of legislation-space is naked communist tyranny.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @ClarkHat
I don't see how it could be communist. Realist, maybe.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Nick_B_Steves @ClarkHat
Well, we have bloated legal codes. How 'realist' are they?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @ClarkHat
They're bloated because we have universal laws with paid-for pseudo-principled exceptions. Pseudo-principles require much ink.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ClarkHat @Outsideness
It has everything to do with universalism... or more specifically Massachusetts imposing its will on all the provinces.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Massachusetts cannot sleep at night knowing that somewhere there are social arrangements of which they don't approve.
3 replies 10 retweets 39 likes -
.
@380kmh is this true, or do you only apply it to train-related social arrangements?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Octapode @Nick_B_Steves and
I can't see Nick's tweets, I'm blocked--not sure what your question is in reference to
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
hahahahaha this is definitely true, I try to restrict myself to imposing my will on Massachusetts and the rest of New England, no further
-
-
I don't think there's anything wrong with hating social arrangements in the rest of the world, just don't visit them in that case!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
But noooo, we gotta combine that piousness with the inalienable right to be a tourist anywhere on the planet...smh...
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.