Once again, we find slight reductions for early morning and late night, and we find extra frequency during rush hours.
-
-
Replying to @380kmh
Before continuing, let me clarify that Tsurukawa is a minor station on the line; more important stops have double this frequency
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @380kmh
With that out of the way: what lessons can we draw from this for Boston? First, that all-day ridership is the market, not just commuters...
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
...and second, that to serve this market, you maintain a basic frequency for most hours of service for every day of the year.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
For crowded times of day, you might add extra frequency--but the difference won't be drastic (6 -> 7 per hour vs 1 -> 4 per hour)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
Why wouldn't you need to double the frequency during rush hour? Because your baseline frequency allows considerable excess capacity!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
This way, for most of your hours of operation, the train will be comfortably empty--plenty of seats relative to the number of riders
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
During rush hour, *existing capacity fills first* before you have to worry about running extra trains...
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
...and when you DO need to add extra trains, you won't need to add that many.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
plane posting isn't for me...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.