freight shipping isn't useless
-
-
Replying to @imaginary_nums
ya and rail isn't the only way to ship freight what's your point
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @imaginary_nums @380kmh
saying we have the rails. we don't have passenger trains because that would require public investment and we hate that
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @imaginary_nums
would argue abt the reasons we don't have passenger rail but otherwise yes, your points about freight are true
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @380kmh @imaginary_nums
regardless; when I am speaking about rail, I--and the OP I quoted, too--am referring to *passenger rail*
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
ok but in the US outside of metro, they are the same railways
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @imaginary_nums
no, unless the freight trains provide passenger service--thinking that rail SERVICE = track on the ground is nuts
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @380kmh
they are not the same, but it affects it. freight dictates when amtrak can run, the cost of using the rails, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @imaginary_nums @380kmh
me: why don't poors just relocate to where good jobs are? also me: we shall not invest one cent into public transport
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
*we shall not permit residential development in urbanized areas
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.