lol no way, the USA is still doing much worse than it ought to given its wealth and population
regardless; when I am speaking about rail, I--and the OP I quoted, too--am referring to *passenger rail*
-
-
and we can split hairs about *why* our passenger rail is worse than it ought to be, but fact remains that it is
-
even in our busiest cities, or on the most logical corridors, it's a disaster
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
ok but in the US outside of metro, they are the same railways
-
no, unless the freight trains provide passenger service--thinking that rail SERVICE = track on the ground is nuts
-
they are not the same, but it affects it. freight dictates when amtrak can run, the cost of using the rails, etc.
-
me: why don't poors just relocate to where good jobs are? also me: we shall not invest one cent into public transport
-
*we shall not permit residential development in urbanized areas
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.