their network isn't "for passengers," but it carries far more passengers for the same reason
-
-
I was thinking about how America is at a point where it needs to rebuild/replace a ton of infatracuture anyway.
-
And self-driving cars (IMO) will lead to mass non-ownership for fist time in a century. So we can rethink what to replace it with.
-
self-driving cars will (afaik) still run on ordinary roads; you only need rail where roads alone can't cope w demand...
-
...and in those places, you need road AND rail to meet travel needs
-
think of it like the second deck on a bus, maybe--you don't remove the first level when you add the second, etc (weak analogy)
-
that's exactly where I started with, thinking you need to pay for both networks.
-
right but u see what I'm saying about u only build the "second" network when you have 2 networks worth of users, right?
-
yes, you got me straightened out :-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.