Apparently JR Freight has never posted a profit, trucks are far more popular for shipping freight in Japan than trains are
-
-
Replying to @380kmh
It's conventional wisdom in the USA that freight rail is naturally profitable, and that passenger rail always needs a subsidy
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
Turns out this has everything to do with geography, population, and resources--not anything inherent in freight or passenger rail
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
Where population is sparse, raw materials abundant, and distances are substantial, passenger rail won't work, freight rail will make money
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
Where population is high, raw materials trivial (as share of economy), and distances modest, passenger rail thrives, freight impractical
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @380kmh
If you recall, this was noticed in the USA all the way back in 1895, about New Englandpic.twitter.com/LfwsH23ZJi
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
Places with an economy based on extracting raw materials almost always extract them for *distant* markets, not local use
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @380kmh
Therefore, cheap ways of shipping large quantities of raw materials over long distances are crucial in such places...trains beat trucks here
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @380kmh
But places with diversified, productive, urban economies need to move many small batches of expensive freight over short distances...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @380kmh
...and from any number of origins to any number of destinations. Trucks beat trains for this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Once again I must emphasize: the USA is *not a uniform nation!* What is conventional wisdom for Wyoming is nonsense for Massachusetts!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.