I like kings but I don't like emperors
that is, any country (or city) ought to have its own ruler, not be ruled from afar
-
-
I think only because an emperor existed it was possible for, say, Hammelin or Reuss to govern itself
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He was a semi-legendary link of your little kingdom with other kingdom of similar culture
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You, commoner, never really heard about the remote emperor. But it mught be conforting to know he was over there, just in case
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's like a safety mechanism, not to use but in extreme cases. The German emperor didn't rule, say, Bremen, but OVER Bremen
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But the Christian emperor doesn't really rule over contries' citizens, but over their kings, so to speak.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.