The first option is to stagnate and hope for the best. Hope other cities will take up the work of economic development where you left off.
-
-
Eventually, an up-and-coming city has imitated all that's worth imitating, invented whatever it can invent, and become a mature city.
-
A mature city can only grow again when it finds itself "backward," behind the level of development of newer mature cities...
-
...and therefore in a position to imitate and invent once again. Some cities pull this off, some never do, and simply stagnate indefinitely.
-
This is the other problem with the imperial approach: betting that all future development will come out of one ever-growing city.
-
(looking forward to the full essay/blogpost/op-ed!)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.