God = the good in a way that, say, water might = H20? The first makes it analytically equivalent, the second...
-
-
is just to say God = the good is true insofar as God is a constitution of the good despite it being
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
possible that God is not the good in the analytically equivalent sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If the first one, it falls to Moore's Open Question Argument. If the second, we have to push it back even further:
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
We ask: Does the fact that God = the good mean that there is a metaphysically necessary connection here? other words:
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Is he the good because he just has to be? If we admit this, we actually find ourselves having a moral platonist
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
insight: the last analysis makes *necessity* the driver of moral facts and not God himself.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Which blends well with my view that moral facts are states of affairs that necessarily obtain.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gabrielamadej @Logo_Daedalus
lmao, not sure what to tell u except that I think you're approaching this in the wrong way
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @380kmh @Logo_Daedalus
perhaps i am. however my studies in meta-ethics was in my Peak Analytic Sperg phase.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.