Because why would you want to have a carriage in the train which passengers can't sit in?
-
-
Replying to @RationalNazi @inretentis
it looks cool when you have a carriage they can sit in too, and covers maintenance costs better
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RationalNazi @inretentis
primary consideration; what you can't pay for you can't have
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
We used to do high speed (to 125 mph) streamlined steam engines. They were cool as fuck.pic.twitter.com/4En0qN9H06
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Hard to argue against this aesthetic or the power/speed it had.pic.twitter.com/h6iPhSHbUY
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RoteCaption @inretentis
dude I will argue with all three--the aesthetic isn't as good as modern HSR...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
...the power and speed are well below modern HSR too...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
...and don't get me started on all that smoke
7:26 AM - 8 Dec 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.