Uber wants to be the transit infrastructure for 21st C Uber wants to be able to ban users based on private standards See an issue?
not feasible; space constraints on single-occupant vehicles are why large cities have trains and buses in the first place
-
-
There are subburbs already doing this! And you think Uber doesn't want to run busses?
-
suburbs, sure--places where buses are not a viable or practical way to get around. In which case...
-
...you're already effectively "banned" from transit (since you can't use it to do anything), and presumably can't afford a car
-
since if you could own a car, why worry about uber?
-
how much longer are humans going to be allowed to drive cars?
-
how much longer are humans going to avoid walking as a means of transportation?
-
Less than 1% of American cities are walkable enough to allow full participation in life without transit.
-
exactly, and if you think that the transit in those cities allows "full participation in life" you are off your rocker
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
but moreover, if you get banned from all public transportation, effect is the same
-
Right, but that's harder than getting banned from Uber. And you can go to Court to get reinstated. Public standards & due process
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.