Loyalty relationships apply in the sort of categories Confucius talks about--ruler to ruled, father to son, husband to wife, etc etc
-
-
Loyalty relationships exist so that transactional relationships are possible
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
or the foundation and facade are inseparable. Foundation is product of prior facades
-
loyalty relationships still transactional, just following a different script. Part of a different identity or set of identities
-
noooo, not at all transactional--diametrically opposed mindsetspic.twitter.com/l9H2ZDY8Mv
-
ok. We're on different levels here. They are both transactional in that person who performs either mindset accrues some benefit
-
yes, they are both for benefit--my contention is that this isn't what makes something transactional or not
-
indeed. We've been reading Foucault and other contributors to post-modernism and performative theory of identity for class lately
-
so that's what everything filters through for me right now
-
big revelation for me is if human identity is performative, this is not good/bad. It simply is. This seems lost on most people
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.