And yet, compare them to the USA: a city like Houston gets 3 trips per direction per WEEK.
...to suburbanize them, but near enough to benefit from city technology and capital. This ties in directly to what Jacobs discusses...
-
-
...in Cities and the Wealth of Nations.
-
Epilogue: with all this in mind, let me be clear about what my intentions for transit in greater New England would mean...
-
This network is maximum buildout--what would actually materialize would be whatever parts of this Boston, NYC, Montreal could support.pic.twitter.com/Ocnt0sF8sy
-
And by "support" I do not mean with tax revenue, propping up unproductive lines in stagnating regions...
-
...I mean what the surplus revenue from urban *ridership* could support--the way it works in Japan. This means that the core of the plan...
-
...is about improving transit *in those major cities.* Perhaps if a city like Moncton starts booming, it could join the club.
-
But, I wouldn't hold my breath. Further discussions in this vein will focus less on the train side, more on the econ side.
-
This has been a
#TrainTwitter explanatory thread. We hope you learned something new and valuable here today!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.