Vehicular throughput has severe space constraints, so multipliers are important. To move 10,000 people by car, you need...
-
-
So, cities need to grow--which means they need to be able to handle greater and greater concentrations of commercial activity.
-
IF--big if--the only limits to human development are ingenuity, then I think "3 dimensional" commercial space will be more common in future.
-
Currently, development of this intensity only exists where the transportation tech allows it to: at a handful of VERY busy stations in Japan
-
Shinjuku, Ikebukuro, Yokohama, Shibuya, Tokyo, Osaka, etc...a handful more, tops. But I suspect this is the core of cities of the future.
-
There is in fact one example of a city which WAS built according to this principle, now demolished: Kowloon Walled City.
-
It solved the transportation problem in a drastic fashion; everyone who worked there also lived there. Remarkable place, RIP.
-
Kowloon represents a rough draft, a trial run. The transit hubs of Japan are a second draft, more "first-world" this time.
-
For this sort of truly spatial (rather than planar) development, high-capacity transport is needed on X and Y axes; elevators & trains.
-
This, then, is my way of saying that cities w/o cars are possible, and cities w/o trains WERE possible...but prob won't be from now on.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
mehhhh
-
sorry i meant to post a picture of skyscrapers with trains that go between them on, like, bridges whoops
-
ohhh hahaha
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.