I think the only truly authoritative voice in NRx, @Outsideness would disagree. I believe in the right to self-definition.
-
-
-
I know he disagrees but NRx is sort of de facto altright the way abortion is de facto sacrifice to Moloch
-
maybe a better analogy would be to say that Tibetan independence activists are de facto agents of the US State dpt
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
For instance I think moldbug's ideal meritocratic city would be HBD aware, but fairly race blind per orders of the king to talent.
-
yeah that sounds about right
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
you can be ancap and not altright, or you can be ancap & altright.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
alt-right is ill defined but i think a necessary part of a definition is white interest group politics.
-
major part, but not a necessary part
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think Land would disagree with some force.
-
You bet he would, but it would still be true
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You can be NRx and altright, but you can also be NRx and not altright.
-
not true
-
In any case
#NRx was influential on twitter b/c /pol/ wasn't on twitter. NRx had a fad on /pol/ but is now largely irrelevant. -
More time by MSM belongs to looking at Richard Spencer than Curtis Yarvin.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@TheDrewSummitt correct.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.