LRT: global warming as physical threat or moral failing is not an effective message! Beat for beat, it sounds identical to evangelism, complete with promise of fiery (well...very hot) punishment at some future date. And as ppl know, the way to hell is fun, and to salvation, hard.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @380kmh
U FORGOT THE EXTREMELY INCONVENIENT FOR THEM POLLUTION MAPpic.twitter.com/uiuBRgfiLe
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MAGApupper
This is pretty obviously recording dust storms as air pollution dude, there's no other source in a lot of the reddest patches here
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
NOPE IT'S A 5 YEAR SLOW GATHERING MAP IN OPTIMAL CONDITIONS OF SULFATES+NITRATES IF U WANT TO AVOID AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER ARGUMENT WE COULD LOOK AT METHANE (AVOIDING OCEANIC DATA BC I'M TRYING TO BE NICE)pic.twitter.com/xNP9SrgygD
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Ya I'm sure you know what you're talking about here but I'm also sure you've noticed my approach is quite unconcerned with global warming (and that if sulfates and nitrates want to concentrate in the Sahara, well, good for them, but I doubt they started there)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.